Scientific Abstract
Overview & Methodology
Compliance evidence is typically reconstructed retrospectively from logs never designed to serve as evidence. We present an architecture in which attestable artefacts are emitted at the point of action and signed before aggregation, and evaluate storage, verification and retrieval cost against three regulatory regimes with differing retention and reporting-window requirements, including the six-hour CERT-In incident window.
Citation & Indexing
Standard Citation
A. Kumar, B. Pancholi, U. Banerjee. Evidence as operational exhaust: continuous compliance artefact generation in sovereign deployments. ACM Digital Threats: Research and Practice, 2026. doi:10.0000/uelement.2026.003
BibTeX Entry
@article{kumar2026evidence,
title = {Evidence as operational exhaust: continuous compliance artefact generation in sovereign deployments},
author = {Kumar, A. and Banerjee, U. and Pancholi, B.},
journal= {ACM Digital Threats: Research and Practice},
year = {2026},
doi = {10.0000/uelement.2026.003}
}Applied in Real-world Infrastructure
Explore case studiesThis theoretical finding runs in active enterprise production.
Discover how our engineering teams deployed these concepts under real-world operational constraints.
Publication Access
Reference IDUE-RES-2026-003
FormatPeer-reviewed
DOI10.0000/uelement.2026.003
LicenceCC BY 4.0 (Open Access)
Applied Sovereignty
Science translated into battle-tested code.
Our case studies document exactly where each of these scientific breakthroughs met concrete operational constraints, regulatory mandates, and enterprise latency budgets.
StamBH Delivery CommitmentsGuaranteed
- ◆2-hour architecture mapping workshop
- ◆Production-grade functional slice in 5 business days
- ◆100% client-owned source code & assets; zero vendor lock-in
- ◆Edge-native performance with zero proprietary runtime bloat
Typical delivery velocity5 business days
